Go_to_gaia_btn
Mygaia_btn
Comm_home_btn
Gaia_mail_btn
Remember me
Powered by Zaadz
What do you seek?
Explore
Questions & Reflections

Advertising keeps Gaia free! Interested in sponsoring us?

What is Altitude?

Posted on Mar 31st, 2008 by sosan : psychoactive bodhisattva sosan

The concept of Altitude is a radically new approach to development created by Ken Wilber and presented in his book Integral Spirituality. In Holons, we use Altitude as a measure of development in both culture and consciousness. A simple way to explain it is to say that Altitude indicates the degree of developmental unfolding of items such as complexity, consciousness, and the number of perspectives one can take. For example, in consciousness development as indicated below, one goes from the capacity to take only a 1st-person perspective, to also being able to take a 2nd-person perspective, to also being able to take a 3rd-person perspective, and so on. Thus, in this example, you can see that the capacity for love increases (from being able to love only me, to being able to love us, to being able to love all of us, to being able to love all sentient beings....). For convenience, Altitude follows the natural colors of the rainbow, so you'll often hear us refer to degree of development or degree of consciousness or degree of capacity to love, etc. by a particular color of the rainbow (as you will see below).

The occasions in Culture by Altitude are placed on the rainbow in terms of the degree of complexity that they have. In order to communicate effectively, you have to be able to hit the same degree of complexity as the person or persons you’re speaking to. To not make an attempt to adjust your speech to another sentient being is mean, a form of subtle aggression. By learning to spot degree of complexity, you can more effectively communicate and enhance mutual understanding.

We have selected three well-known examples of psychological models to show how easily Altitude can be used to measure them: Abraham Maslow's "Needs," Jean Gebser's "Worldviews," and Clare Graves' "Value Systems." To show the usefulness of Altitude of consciousness, if we say at a given time a person is acting "amber," it means that generally their needs are for belongingness, their worldview is mythic, and their value system is absolutistic. Various cultural events can also be measured by their degree of development or their Altitude—and their movement from one to another as they unfold can also be followed: from archaic (infrared) to tribal (magenta/red) to traditional (amber) to modern (orange) to postmodern (green) to integral (turquoise) to even higher structures that are now evolving, and which we lump together and refer to as indigo. We estimate the Center of Gravity (COG) of a cultural happening (such as a book, movie, etc.) and place it on the Culture By Altitude chart. As always, these colors follow the rainbow and are identical wherever they appear.

Altitude colors measure essentially similar degrees of development wherever you see the same color (e.g. red is always some version of egocentric, self-protective, magical-power—and you know this will be essentially the same whether you're measuring culture or consciousness or capacity for love or capacity for ethics). We often speak of Center of Gravity, for the central part of the action system, whether individual or collective, and the colors are primarily assigned to COG.

(Another revolutionary concept presented in Integral Spirituality is the difference between structures of consciousness and states of consciousness. Altitude applies primarily to structures of consciousness, and those structures generally emerge through a developmental sequence of stages or waves, starting at infrared and unfolding through a rainbow of possibility from there. Many states, however, are available to everyone no matter the Altitude of their COG. States include the three natural states of waking, dreaming, and deep sleep, as well as altered states, peak experiences, intoxicated states, and the entire spectrum of spiritual states, from gross states of oneness with nature, to subtle grace and illumination, to causal formless absorption, to pure witnessing and nondual union with all that is arising. Because most states are ever-present, individuals can have authentic spiritual experiences at any stage or Altitude of development. States and stages, however, are deeply interrelated: research has shown that continued development through stages can help convert passing states into permanent traits, which is one of the more exciting findings of an Integral Approach....)



The Altitudes


Some representative instances of the major colors:

Infrared (archaic—a proto 1st-person perspective): infrared Altitude signifies a degree of development that is in many ways imbedded in nature, body, and the gross realm in general. Infrared Altitude exhibits an archaic worldview, physiological needs (food, water, shelter, etc.), a self-sense that is minimally differentiated from its environment, and is in nearly all ways oriented towards physical survival. Although present in infants, infrared is rarely seen in adults except in cases of famine, natural disasters, or other catastrophic events. infrared is also used as a kind of catch-all term for all earlier evolutionary stages and drives.

Magenta (egocentric—able to take a 1st-person perspective): Magenta Altitude tends to be the home of egocentric drives, a magical worldview, and impulsiveness. It is expressed through magic/animism, kin-spirits, and such. Young children primarily operate with a magenta worldview. Magenta in any line of development is fundamental, or "square one" for any and all new tasks. Magenta emotions and cognition can be seen driving cultural phenomena such as Burning Man, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, or superhero-themed comic books or movies.

Red (ego-to-ethnocentric—able to take a 1st- to 2nd-person perspective): Red Altitude is the marker of egocentric drives based on power, where "might makes right," where aggression rules, and where there is a limited capacity to take the role of an "other." Red impulses are classically seen in grade school and early high school, where bullying, teasing, and the like are the norm. Red motivations can be seen culturally in Ultimate Fighting contests, which have no fixed rules (fixed rules come into being at the next Altitude, amber), teenage rebellion and the movies that cater to it (The Fast and the Furious), gang dynamics (where the stronger rule the weaker), and the like.

Amber (ethnocentric—able to take a 2nd-person perspective): Amber Altitude indicates a worldview that is mythic, and mythic worldviews are always held as absolute (this stage of development is often called absolutistic). Instead of "might makes right," amber ethics are more oriented to the group, but one that extends only to "my" group. Grade school and high school kids usually exhibit amber motivations to "fit in." Amber ethics help to control the impulsiveness and narcissism of red. Culturally, amber worldviews can be seen in fundamentalism (my God is right no matter what); extreme patriotism (my country is right no matter what); and ethnocentrism (my people are right no matter what).

Orange (worldcentric—able to take a 3rd-person perspective): In an orange worldview, the individual begins to move away from the amber conformity that reifies the views of one's religion, nation, or tribe. The orange worldview often begins to emerge in late high school, college, or adulthood. Culturally, the orange worldview realizes that "truth is not delivered; it is discovered," spurring the great advances of science and formal rationality. Orange ethics begin to embrace all people, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal...." Ayn Rand's Objectivism, the US Bill of Rights, and many of the laws written to protect individual freedom all flow from an orange worldview.

Green (worldcentric—able to take a 4th-person perspective): Green worldviews are marked by pluralism, or the ability to see that there are multiple ways of seeing reality. If orange sees universal truths ("All men are created equal"), green sees multiple universal truths—different ones for different cultures. Green ethics continue, and radically broaden, the movement to embrace all people. A green statement might read, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all people are created equal, regardless of race, gender, class...." Green ethics have given birth to the civil rights, feminist, and gay rights movements, as well as environmentalism.

The green worldview's multiple perspectives give it room for greater compassion, idealism, and involvement, in its healthy form. Such qualities are seen by organizations such as the Sierra Club, Amnesty International, Union of Concerned Scientists, and Doctors Without Borders. In its unhealthy form green worldviews can lead to extreme relativism, where all beliefs are seen as relative and equally true, which can in turn lead to the nihilism, narcissism, irony, and meaninglessness exhibited by many of today's intellectuals, academics, and trend-setters.... Not to mention another "lost" generation in students.

Teal (worldcentric to kosmocentric—able to take a 4th/5th-person perspective): Teal Altitude marks the beginning of an integral worldview, where pluralism and relativism are transcended and included into a more systematic whole. The teal worldview honors the insights of the green worldview, but places it into a larger context that allows for healthy hierarchies, and healthy value distinctions.

Perhaps most important, a teal worldview begins to see the process of development itself, acknowledging that each one of the previous stages (magenta through green) has an important role to play in the human experience. Teal consciousness sees that each of the previous stages reveals an important truth, and pulls them all together and integrates them without trying to change them to “be more like me,” and without resorting to cultural relativism (“all are equal”).

Teal worldviews do more than just see all points of view (that’s a green worldview)—it can see and honor them, but also critically evaluate them.

Turquoise (kosmocentric—able to take a 5th-person perspective): Turquoise is a mature integral view, one that sees not only healthy hierarchy but also the various quadrants of humans knowledge, expression, and inquiry (at the minimum: I, we, and it). While teal worldviews tend to be secular, turquoise is the first to begin to integrate Spirit as a living force in the world (manifested through any or all of the 3 Faces of God: “I”—the “No self” or “witness” of Buddhism; “we/thou”—the “great other” of Christianity, Judaism, Hindusm, Islam, etc.; or “it”—the “Web of Life” seen in Taoism, Pantheism, etc.).

Indigo (continues and deepens kosmocentric—able to take 6th-person perspective and higher): Evolution and development continues growing, and we have no reason to believe it will stop with the stage that we are at now. We have indicated all of these higher possibilities with the next color in the rainbow after turquoise, which is indigo.

For a more complete discussion of levels and lines of development, and the AQAL model in general, click here for a free PDF.

Also be sure to check out What are the Four Quadrants?, which summarizes the four major perspectives that are intrinsically built into the universe....

* From Holons News

Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print Send views (285)  

What are the 4 Quadrants?

Posted on Mar 31st, 2008 by sosan : psychoactive bodhisattva sosan

According to Integral Theory, there are at least 4 primary dimensions or perspectives through which we can experience the world: subjective, intersubjective, objective, and interobjective.

These 4 perspectives, represented graphically, are the upper-left, lower-left, upper-right, and lower-right quadrants.






In the subjective—or upper-left—quadrant, we find the world of our individual, interior experiences: our thoughts, emotions, memories, states of mind, perceptions, and immediate sensations—in other words, our “I” space.

In the intersubjective—or lower-left—quadrant, we find the world of our colletive, interior experiences: our shared values, meanings, language, relationships, and cultural background—in other words, our "we" space.

In the objective—or upper-right—quadrant, we find the world of individual, exterior things: our material body (including brain) and anything that you can see or touch (or observe scientifically) in time and space—in other words, our “it” space.

In the interobjective—or lower-right—quadrant, we find the world of collective, exterior things: systems, networks, technology, government, and the natural environment—in other words, our “its” space.



What’s the point of looking at the world through a 4-quadrant lens?

Simple answer: Anything less is narrow, partial and fragmented! Integral Theory maintains that all 4 quadrants are real—and all are important. So, for example, to the question of what is more real, the brain (with its neural pathways and structures) or the mind (with its thoughts and perceptions), Integral Theory answers: BOTH.

Moreover, we add that the mind and brain are situated in cultural and systemic contexts, which influence both inner experience and brain activity in irreducible ways.

What’s more important in human behavior? The psychology of the mind (upper left), or the cultural conditioning of the individual (lower left)? Integral Theory answers, again: BOTH. What is more critical in social development? The habits, customs, and norms of a culture (lower left), or the products it produces (like gun and steel – lower right). Integral Theory answers: BOTH.

All four quadrants are real, all are important, and all are essential for understanding your world.

While some might like to reduce reality to the mind (upper-left quadrant), and others to the brain (upper-right quadrant), and still others to the influence of cultural context (lower-left quadrant), and yet others to the effect of systems (“it’s the economy, stupid!” i.e., lower-right quadrant), Integral Theory holds that ALL 4 QUADRANTS are indispensable. The more we can consciously include the 4 quadrants in our perspective, the more whole, balanced, healthy, comprehensive, and effective our actions will be.

And it all boils down to just four dimensions. It's as easy as I, we, it, and its!

That’s why each issue of Holons presents “your world through an integral lens.” It’s a quick and easy way of taking a comprehensive and fun (!) tour of the 4 quadrants of your world.

Want to learn more? CLICK HERE to download our free PDF, “Introduction to Integral Theory and Practice,” by Ken Wilber.

Also be sure to check out What is Altitude?, which summarizes the Integral approach to developmental studies....

* From Holons News
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print Send views (37)  

What is Boomeritis?

Posted on Mar 31st, 2008 by sosan : psychoactive bodhisattva sosan

Diagnosis: The postmodern cultural condition whereby highly developed cognitive pluralism becomes infected with poorly developed emotional narcissism.

Symptoms include (but are not limited to): rampant deconstructive tendencies; fits of nihilism and romanticism; self-serving victimhood; aperspectival madness; idiot compassion and reckless egalitarianism; frequent outbreaks of hypocrisy and performative contradiction; earth-shaking delusions of grandeur.

Prognosis: Boomeritis is a parasite which feeds off of the fruits of postmodernity. Those inflicted often lose themselves in a solipsistic playground of self-indulgence where, under the banner of pluralism, they place themselves at the center of the universe, only to awaken one day in a barren wasteland of self-deception and spiritual impotence. This disease ultimately infects the entire Spiral, collapsing it into flatland inanity, widening and reinforcing the gaps between each successive stage of consciousness by viciously denying developmental stages altogether. Under the hypnotic gaze of Boomeritis, multiculturalism becomes rigid identity politics; pluralism becomes fascist political correctness; and ecological sensitivity becomes the Unabomber.

Treatment: Integral Life Practice, familiarization with the Always Already, high doses of humility and humor.

* From Holons News
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print Send views (26)  

The Three Faces of Spirit: Where is Awareness Locating Itself?

Posted on Mar 31st, 2008 by sosan : psychoactive bodhisattva sosan

Buddhist Geeks

BuddhistGeeks_170.png


Audio Dialogue: The Three Faces of Spirit: Where is Awareness Locating Itself?



Running Time: 26:14

Hosted by: Guests:

 

Where does awareness tend to locate itself? And how is this important in our experience and understanding of the Buddhist path of awakening? This week Diane Musho Hamilton—Zen sensei and Big Mind lineage holder—joins us again to discuss the importance of what Ken Wilber has called the three faces of spirit.

Using this as a powerful notion we explore questions about how and why lineage is passed down, the way that Buddhism adapts to new cultures and why it is particularly vulnerable to being destroyed, how cultural development impacts the tradition, issues surrounding the master-disciple relationship, and finally whether or not one can regulate the erotic impulse.

This is part 2 of a two-part series. Listen to part 1: Discover Yourself as a Perspective-Taking Being.

Related Resources:

- BigMind.org
- Talks with Genpo Roshi on Buddhist Geeks
- Essential Spirituality: The 7 Central Practices to Awaken Heart and Mind by Roger Walsh
- "Women Who Sleep with Their Gurus ... and Why They Love It" by Jessica Roemischer

Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print Send views (61)  

Discover Yourself as a Perspective-Taking Being

Posted on Mar 30th, 2008 by sosan : psychoactive bodhisattva sosan

Buddhist Geeks

BuddhistGeeks_170.png

Audio Dialogue: Discover Yourself as a Perspective-Taking  Being

Running Time: 27:50

Hosted by: Guests:

 

Diane Musho Hamilton, Zen sensei and Big Mind lineage holder, joins us to discuss her personal story on the path of awakening. From experiencing the death of several friends at a young age, to studying with Chogyam Trunpga in the mid-80s, to becoming the first lineage holder of a unique new spiritual process called Big Mind, join us as Diane shares the intimate details of her life as a seeker (and non-seeker).

In this dialogue we also touch in on the importance that the work of integral philosopher Ken Wilber has had on her teaching, especially with regards to what Wilber calls the three primordial perspectives. These three perspectives can be summarized by the pronouns, "I" (first-person), "we" (second-person), and "it" (third-person). Find out why these perspectives are so important to someone who is trying to bring together the spiritual quest with all of their other endeavors.

This is part 1 of a two-part series. Listen to Part 2, The Three Faces of Spirit: Where is Awareness Locating Itself? (airing next week)

Related Resources:

- BigMind.org
- Integral Institute
- Ken Wilber

Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print Send views (39)  

Geeks of the Round Table (tm)

Posted on Mar 30th, 2008 by sosan : psychoactive bodhisattva sosan


Audio Dialogue: Geeks of the Round Table (tm)


Running Time: 32:33
Hosted by:

Guests:
The Geeks of the Round Table™ continue their discussion on the Big Mindprocess and the criticisms from Zen teacher Brad Warner, in his art icle
Big Mind™ is a Big Load™ of Horse Shit (link goes to SuicideGirls, an alt porn site). The geeks focus on these criticisms which include charging for the dharma, the nature of an authentic transmission, trademarking Dharma practice, ethical issues with marketing the dharma, and issues of confusing personal psychology with transpersonal states and stages. Hold on to your seat and be prepared to be whisked into a world of geeky and fun banter between these young (and foolhardy) practitioners.

This is Part two of a two-part series. Listen to Part 1: McZen: A Double Satori with Cheese.

Related Resources:

- Big Mind™ is a Big Load™ of Horse Shit
by Brad Warner (Keep in mind that this article is hosted on
SuicideGirls, an alt porn site, that Brad writes on occasionally. Might
not be good to open at work.)

- Genpo Roshi on Buddhist Geeks

- Brad Warner on Buddhist Geeks

- BigMind.org

- Tracing Back the Radiance: Chinul's Korean Way of Zen by Robert Buswell

- Seth Godin

- Instant Enlightenment: Fast, Deep, and Sexy by David Deida

- Sex, Ecology, Spirituality by Ken Wilber




Access_public Access: Public 1 Comment Print Send views (58)  

McZen: A Double Satori with Cheese

Posted on Mar 30th, 2008 by sosan : psychoactive bodhisattva sosan

Buddhist Geeks



BuddhistGeeks_170.png


Audio Dialogue: McZen: A Double Satori with Cheese


Running Time: 18:20

Hosted by:
Guests:

This is an experimental dialogue called Geeks of the Round Table. In this
session we speak with two young Buddhist practitioners in a round-table
format about Brad Warner's criticisms of the Big Mind process, in an
article he wrote called, Big Mind™ is a Big Load™ of Horse Shit
(link goes to SuicideGirls, an alt porn site). We are joined by a
student of Genpo Roshi's as well as someone who has a more skeptical
view of the Big Mind process.

This quick-paced dialogue covers a number of interesting topicsincluding the difference between altered states and permanent traits,issues of marketing the Dharma, the nature of skillful means,transmission and practice, the important dialectic between traditionand innovation, and the recipe for a sensational new sandwich, the double satori with cheese.

This is part 1 of a two-part series. Listen to Part 2: Geeks of the Round Table™.

Related Resources:

- Big Mind™ is a Big Load™ of Horse Shit
by Brad Warner (Keep in mind that this article is hosted on
SuicideGirls, an alt porn site, that Brad writes on occasionally. Might
not be good to open at work.)

- Genpo Roshi on Buddhist Geeks

- Brad Warner on Buddhist Geeks

- BigMind.org

- Skillful Means / Upaya

Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print Send views (51)  

The Ring In the Bull's Nose

Posted on Mar 19th, 2008 by sosan : psychoactive bodhisattva sosan

Do you know about the ring? The one in the bull's nose? You know, the bull in the Ten Ox Herding Pictures. The bull has a ring in it's nose.  The ring of desire. To obtain power is quite simple, really. Figure out the ring in another and you can lead that bull by the nose anywhere you like. That's where the power lies you see. What does the ring represent for you? Who leads you? What's your desire? I suggest you look, cuz I bet you will be surprised to see who leads you by the nose diggity!!

Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print Send views (42)  

1-2-3 of Koans

Posted on Mar 19th, 2008 by sosan : psychoactive bodhisattva sosan

What is a koan anyway? Literally, a koan is a "public document or legal precedent ". In the Zen tradition, a koan is a statement, question, anecdote, or dialogue that cannot be understood or resolved intellectually. A koan is not a riddle or a puzzle meant to boggle the mind. It has a most definitive objective; transcending duality beyond sanity and madness. Can you dig?

 

The role of the koan in Zen practice is to supersede the subject-object duality. A koan is like a finger pointing at the moon; intended to synthesize the dualism of mind. Koans are used in concert with zazen (sitting meditation). Zazen is used as the means of reaching a solution to a koan. Even if one understands the koan, its deep, spiritual truth will not be integrated if the student is not trained in zazen.  So sit motha-fucker!! A Zen slap to the back of the head. Boo-yay!

 

Okay, now that we have a working definition of a koan, let's work it!!

 

The most famous koan (because it is the first koan Zen students are presented) is…

 

What is Mu?

 

What is motha-fucking mu you ask? Let's find out…take a journey with me, together, hand in hand. Don't be scared, sosan will be right here with you the whole time baby.

 

We are presented with the koan. It is an IT, 3rd person, outside of us, external. Here the koan is an object, a thing, separate from us, over there, way over there. IT is something to be worked.

 

Now, let's sit in zazen and work with this koan, What is Mu? As we sit with this entity, we begin to create a "We" space, a relationship with this koan, in 2nd person. Herein lies the pain of koan practice. Through this relationship, doubt arises and is pushed to its utmost limits. The koan stands in front of you like an iron wall, threatening to overcome every intellectual effort to pass. You hesitate, you doubt, you become agitated. The relationship becomes more defined, You vs. Mu. Mu becomes an enemy, an adversary, something to be conquered. This is a battle you are never going to win my friend. Why? What do you mean, why? Because this situation is dualistic in nature, silly. You vs. Mu is precisely the issue dear. You've created a war with lil' old Mu. It is not until this struggle ends and you submit and lie down, does your real practice life begin. Once you surrender to Mu, once the ego is finally too tired to put up a fight, the relationship changes. It changes from 2nd person to 1st person. Yeah, that's right, I said 1st person.

 

The transition from 2nd person to 1st person is quite beautiful, actually. This is the time and place where 2 (you and Mu) become one…just Mu.  Finally, the Truth of Mu is revealed. You actually become Mu. Mu is you. You are Mu. The iron wall that you ran up against over and over and over again melts away, dissolves, as if it were never there to begin with. And ya know what? It never really was there. That's the Kosmic joke, if you will. And I know you will…
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print Send views (58)  

jade mala part 2

Posted on Jan 23rd, 2006 by sosan : psychoactive bodhisattva sosan
i just wanted to see if my experience with malas was scientifically true or if i was making up some crazy narrative for myself. so i did an experiment... i brought the mala that burst during the "divine shit" experience into a shop to be re-strung. i picked it up today and wrapped it around my wrist. i felt great! so, i'm slightly attached to my mala, big deal!! hahaha... approximately 1.5 hours later the damn thing burst as i was tying my shoes. again, i laughed out loud and left the house shaking my head. can you believe this? what's a psychoactive bodhisattva to do?
Access_public Access: Public 5 Comments Print Send views (773)  
Page 1 of 212
Showing 1 - 10 of 12 Results